Header image for: BABY NAMES ARE A PLOT AGAINST SPOCKET AND MY AUNT MILDRED’S PARROT!

BABY NAMES ARE A PLOT AGAINST SPOCKET AND MY AUNT MILDRED’S PARROT!

By Bronbus Quitley · 5/26/2026

Hold the Phone! Your Baby's Name Might Get You Arrested! - By Bronbus Quitley

Alright folks, settle in, settle in! Bronbus Quitley here, your friendly neighborhood name-ologist, and lemme tell ya, things are wild in the baby naming world. Absolutely wild! I was just chatting with my Aunt Mildred’s parrot, Percy – a very astute bird, let me tell you – and he squawked something about naming regulations, and it got me thinkin’.

See, back in my day – oh, the roaring twenties, a simpler time – you could name your kid anything! Anything! I knew a fella named his son “Sprocket.” Sprocket! Good kid, though, real handy with a wrench. But now? Forget about it! The government's got its nose in everything.

Apparently, there are names you just… can’t use. And not because they’re, you know, ugly. Though, some are definitely questionable. No, it’s legal reasons! I did some digging – real deep digging, involved a ladder and a questionable amount of cheese puffs – and discovered a whole mess of forbidden names.

Take “Baby Girl” or “Baby Boy,” for instance. Can you imagine? Apparently, in Arkansas and New Mexico, that's a no-go. What are they afraid of? Literal description? Honestly! It's perfectly descriptive! And “Male” and “Female”? Also verboten in New Mexico. It’s a conspiracy, I tell ya, a conspiracy to confuse the census!

Then there's the number situation. Forget about "1069," folks. California, North Dakota, and Minnesota are apparently terrified of that sequence. I heard it once had something to do with a rogue weather balloon, but that's probably just a rumor. My second cousin twice removed, Bartholomew, swore it was a secret code used by competitive pigeon racers. Anyway, no numbers!

And don’t even think about naming your kid something… offensive. “Test” and “Void” are out in Arkansas, which, frankly, is just good common sense. And “@”? Illegal almost everywhere! Seems like someone tried to name their kid the email symbol and caused a national crisis.

But the truly bizarre stuff? It's international, folks! Germany, rightfully so, has banned “Adolf” and “Aryan.” Understandable, right? Though I once met a lovely gentleman named Adolf… he made a mean potato salad. But still, probably best to avoid it.

Sweden? They’ve outlawed “Metallica” and “Elvis!” Can you believe that?! Apparently, copyright laws extend to babies now! It’s madness! And Malaysia? Forget about naming your little one "Chow Tow" – which, I’m told, means “Smelly Head.” Rude! Just… rude.

And New Zealand and Italy are getting in on the action too, banning names that might, quote, “cause offense or harm.” Honestly, what does that even mean? It's a slippery slope, I tell ya! Next thing you know, they’ll be banning the name “Bronbus” because it’s slightly eccentric! (It’s distinguished, thank you very much.)

So, the moral of the story, folks? Do your research! Don't just pick a name because it sounds nice. Check the regulations! Or, you know, just name your kid “Sprocket.” It’s a classic. You can’t argue with a classic. And if anyone gives you trouble, tell 'em Bronbus Quitley sent you!